(pic links to engadget article; QR goes to market for DL)I was a long time user of Winamp. It has been my standby since I began using it sometime around version 2.0 (prior to 3).
I used it consistently through the early aughts. I maintained an active install of the latest update prior to 3 for quite awhile since the release of 3 was too unwieldy of an architecture at the time for a boot-strapped computer's resources.
Eventually, somewhere in 2007 i moved to Totem, Banshee, Rhythmbox as i had moved into Gutsy Gibbon Ubuntu; and then in 2008 i moved over to Songbird (Genesis release i think). Really had high hopes for that.
Right now I've been between mp3 players for awhile. none of them have exactly the right mix top to bottom. The three big ones to me seem to be itunes, songbird, and winamp; for various reasons (mind you, i am referring to win7).
on the one end of the spectrum, you have a massive .db powered bloat monkey like itunes. on the other hand you can run a leaner shell based program like winamp. or you can try to find balance in between with songbird. this metaphor used to hold. now songbird is so off kilter with the most recent releases i've used that i switched back to a mix of winamp and songbird skipping between the two depending on how im listening. if i know what i want to listen to, i use winamp; if i dont, i use songbird. last i updated, scrobbling was broken on songbird, queries are taking forever to load, library filtering feels clunky. and thats on a fast desktop (either my core2duo or the i7920!).
anyway, on android i have tried the media player built in, as well as 3 ("cubed" - who i hold out high hopes for, but it still feels flimsy and half-baked), and for the past 9 months been thoroughly baiting my breath for an immediate contender. thank you Winamp, i think you have listed a race-maker there.
i saw one comment about it feeling like that standard player. in someways i can understand what they mean; when browsing it uses the android shell and appears to mimic the andro-mp3 player, but actually thats just the browsing default. in many ways the Winamp is actually more deeply integrated with its features than the stock player.
- One thing off the top that Winamp did was add a pane feature that mimics the status pane. They positioned it just low enough below the system status bar that you dont confusedly hit the wrong one (even on a device like the droid whose screen accuracy is sketchy).
- In the stock player it can be disorienting to find where the playing now track is playing so you can change it (i have to switch to home to use the widget frequently, ugh). With this app, when you switch away from the now playing screen, the pane just drops to the other page you switched to, but you still have now playing controls, and with one tap youre back to control central.
- The settings page is aflush with settings, and they actually do something!
Thats just the comparative experience of it. Fantastic. As for the features, it has wireless syncing if you have winamp on your desktop/laptop, the fantastic playlist queueing system of regular winamp, playlist reordering and creation, widget with [ <||, =, |>, ||>, album art track/album/artist, and tap to app], last.fm scrobbling, search integration. pretty full featured.
Requested features? I have a few.
- winamp remote integration (there are apps out there)
- podcast/streaming/shoutbox support
- video?!?
- event listings; like cubed, last.fm, songbird (by extension) have
- track ratings (that integrates with desktop on sync), love track on last.fm
- track tagging, fuller integration of id3
The one criticism i have is the menu button. It has different options from one pane to the next (now playing v. home in particular; the specialized queue menu makes sense). There arent that many buttons; make it a 2x3 menu and condense it.
Otherwise, beautiful job; lets heat this race up. What you gonna do Google? You gonna maybe make your listen/music apps work?