so for any stack nerds out there, the most interesting thing about their Area51 launching site for new stacks is the need to keep a proposal from being imminent flamebait. there are a few stacks and stack proposals out there that are just petri dishes for flame.
a new one is in committment phase (where people sign up to be the backbone community/'experts'). the prop is on atheism. (you can commit by going here.) when you commit you can make a little statement about why you're committing, or just type 'poop'. a lot of the people signing up sound like they want it to be a discussion board. i can't wait to see that. it will probably also be one of the bitchiest metas as well. [my favorite commitment quote is "There is far too much tolerance for religious intolerance, and far too little tolerance for intolerance of religion" from Cogwheel, im not sure where he got that from though]
rebel leadernow im not a fan of flamewars (though flamewarriors.com on the other hand...). but its amazing how, when you put a bunch of self-ordained (or worse, community-ordained reputation toting) 'experts' in a room, the general dickwad theory goes out the window and it becomes this ballet of how far you can push without being straight-up abusive (a flaggable offense). there is on the one hand a fascination of the lengths to which someone will go to prove you wrong. in a vacuum, its for the best really, and it will have people deleting a lot of bad answers often once the multi-k repped users deign to start cracking down on every element of how you're wrong.
but the internet isn't really a vacuum. most sites yearn for fresh blood and long tails. what is comforting for most stacks is that, not matter the risk of evisceration, if you have a question, it will have an answer on many of the sites. (most of my shut-downs are on the site i am most active on, cooking; and despite being thoroughly shut-down i keep going back and participating.) in addition to just answering inaccurately, you can also answer in such a fashion that it is not in the spirit of the particular site (ie, subjectively), or not in the spirit of stack exchange as a platform. as you might expect, questions are more prone to fail to be in the spirit of the site or stack exchange and frequently are closed for that
adminreason. there's a process behind it (mods asking for revisions, etc), and if the community likes the question anyway it normally floats. yet when people start arguing on a stack, as is the wont of experts the world over wherever they are, the layers of argument are fascinating.
nonetheless, i ca't wait for atheism to finally go live (why havent you committed already? hasnt my explanation really sold you on trying stack exchange?) and watch the world devolve. perhaps it will be a harmonious echo chamber where everyone says the same thing. who knows.